Dec 3, 2012 9:20am EST
you have not been on the show very often. i am at a loss for words when you are done. stephen moore, i do hope you come back and see us soon. >> thank you, sir. stuart: here is an example of what i call tax hypocrisy. costco founder going to save because of the dividend payment this year. not next year, this year. the ceo, he is a very big obama supporter. even spoke at the democratic convention. >> a president who understands what the private sector needs to succeed. a president who takes the long view and makes the tough decisions. that is whh i am here tonight supporting president obama. stuart: supports president obama, supports tax the rich, but does not pay the rich taxes. i say tax hypocrisy and i am being very mild. >> i agree. every time i hear the rich guys say, you know, i want to pay more taxes. i say, you know what, if you want to do that, why don't you donate some money to the country. stuart: he borrows the money -- >> borrowings $3.5 billion. stuart: and then costco was downgraded. >> this kind of payout is done with earnings from a company. money is free right now.
Dec 6, 2012 9:20am EST
time to flesh out his thought properly. last night on bill o'reilly "the factor" he was given moore time. >> i thought it was self-evident it was a domestic violence case, on retrospect i don't back up on anything i said. i think it might be more effective if i said look, if we're looking for perspective on this we're going to have a serious discussion within sports, ongoing, not five minutes of fully tears about it, but a discussion about domestic violence, about the culture of game itself. that would have been more effective and would have led to an understanding of what i was coming from. but i was talking about a gun culture, i never used the word second amendment. stuart: all right, interesting stuff and we're going to stay on the gun issue. a twitter war broke out over the second amendment. our next guest, carol roth went on piers morgan to hash out their differences face-to-face. >> what i don't expect is the interpretation of a lesson on the second amendment of the constitution which i think is being misused now to basically endorse everyone in america having an assault rifl